Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Taylor v. Sherman et al
as 1:2013cv00516
Plaintiff:
Theodore Taylor
Defendant:
Dr. Sherman, Nurse Fillingim, Officer Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Carr v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Linda Carr
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Murray v. Birmingham Board of Education et al
as 2:2013cv00822
Plaintiff:
Tommy Murray , Daryl Carr , Shirley Pritchett and others
Defendant:
Birmingham Board of Education, Tyrone Belcher, Sr, Virginia Volker and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Amison v. McKinzey et al
as 7:2013cv00750
Plaintiff:
Terry Amison
Defendant:
William McKinzey, Pickens County Sheriff's Department, David Abston and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monroe v. Byrne et al
as 1:2013cv00089
Plaintiff:
Douglas Monroe
Defendant:
Major Byrne, Capt. Bennett, Sgt. Means and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Vernon, Alabama, City of, The et al
as 2:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jamison Carr
Defendant:
Vernon, Alabama, City of, The , Ted Collins , Brandon Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carr v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
as 1:2012cv03064
Defendant:
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shelia Denise Carr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carr v. USA
as 1:2012cv00570
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Otis G. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jacoby v. Mack et al
as 1:2012cv00366
Plaintiff:
Brent Jacoby
Defendant:
Baldwin County, Huey Mack, Dale Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
