Cases 61 - 70 of 266
Randle v. Barnes et al
as 1:2019cv06548
Defendant:
John Doe, Warden Barnes, Superintendant Hunter and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Randle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Carr et al
as 3:2019cv00899
Plaintiff:
King Michael Oliver and Michael Oliver
Defendant:
Jason Clark, Judge Grace, Judge Bloodwurth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv04200
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Robert Massey, googlejerseys.world and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
ALF Corporation v. Matthews et al
as 1:2019cv03579
Plaintiff:
ALF Corporation
Defendant:
Unknown Occupants, Shawndrica Carr and Kenneth Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02705
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kelley et al v. MailFinance, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00758
Plaintiff:
Myra Glassman, Paige Kelly, Barry Carr and others
Defendant:
Neopost USA, Inc. and MailFinance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Johnson v. Village of Tinley Park et al
as 1:2019cv00510
Plaintiff:
Bonnie R Johnson
Defendant:
Village of Tinley Park, Patrick Carr, Kevin Workowski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rangel v. Village of McCook et al
as 1:2018cv06955
Defendant:
City of Countryside, David Deleshe, Cruz Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Rangel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv50318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Carr v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv05938
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Jeremy Rice and Jeremy L. Rice
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
