Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Khosrow Kamali v. John Hiddleson, et al
as 20-55520
Defendant:
JOHN BULINKSI, in his official capacity as District Director for California Department of Transportation District, SHIRLEY CHOATE, in her official capacity as Chief Deputy Director for California Department of Transportation District 7, and in her personal capacity and LYNETTE VANN, in her official capacity as Deputy District Director of Administration for California Department of Transportation District 7
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN CHRISTOPHER HIDDLESON, in his official capacity as Assitant Chief Legal Counsel for California Department of Transportation District 7, and in his personal capacity, CARRIE BOWEN, in her official capacity as District Director for California Department of Transportation District 7, and in her personal capacity and DUNCAN MCINTOSH, in his official capacity as Deputy District Director of Administration for California Department of Transportation District 7, and in his personal capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHOSROW KAMALI, an individual
Khosrow Kamali v. John Christopher Hiddleson et al
as 8:2019cv01949
Defendant:
Shirley Choate, Duncan McIntosh, Carrie Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Khosrow Kamali
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STAMMERJOHAN v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION et al
as 1:2017cv02618
Plaintiff:
JAY STAMMERJOHAN
Defendant:
CARRIE BOWEN and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DISTRICT 7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Coty, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Carrie Bowens
Defendant:
Coty, Inc. , The Proctor & Gamble Company, Inc. , The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Bowens v. Coty, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Carrie Bowens
Defendant:
Coty, Inc. , The Procter & Gamble Company, Inc. , The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
