Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Carter v. Barone
as 4:2011cv00238
Plaintiff:
Dionne Carter
Defendant:
Claudia Barone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burks v. Carter et al
as 5:2010cv00358
Plaintiff:
Michael Burks
Defendant:
Steve Carter , Ben Hines , Diane Baldwin and others
Cross_claimant:
Diane Baldwin , McGehee-Desha County Hospital and Oboma Asemota
Cross_defendant:
Oboma Asemota , Steve Carter , Ben Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Simes v. Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission et al
as 4:2010cv01047
Plaintiff:
L T Simes, II
Defendant:
Arkansas Judicial Discipline and Disability Commission, Leon N Jamison, John Everett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McCoy et al v. Carter-Jones Timber Company et al
as 5:2008cv00155
Plaintiff:
Robert McCoy, Mary McCoy, Ervin Lea and others
Defendant:
Carter-Jones Timber Company, Arkansas, State of, Mike Beebe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
