Cases 41 - 50 of 377
DUNLAP v. BARRICK, OFFICER et al
as 2:2022cv10553
Plaintiff:
IMANI DUNLAP
Defendant:
ZACHARY BARRICK, OFFICER, CHRIS RABION, OFFICER, R. CARTER, OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carter v. Sprader
as 1:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
James T. Carter
Defendant:
Branda E. Sprader
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
HARGROVE et al v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv12678
Plaintiff:
PR MONIQUE HARGROVE and GERALD HARGROVE, DECEASED
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Don Pray, Michael Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Westshore Engineering and Surveying et al
as 1:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Ronnie E. Carter
Defendant:
Westshore Engineering and Surveying, Scott Tucker doing business as H&M Demolitions Company, Inc. and Jaline Tucker doing business as H&M Demolitions Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rouse et al v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 5:2021cv12670
Plaintiff:
Arthur J. Rouse, John Moore, David Sarfo and others
Defendant:
Michigan Parole Board, State of Michigan, MDOC and others
Carter v. Bouchard et al
as 2:2021cv12309
Plaintiff:
Dennis Carter
Defendant:
Michael Bouchard, Jogan, Ms. Hendrix and others
Carter #177803 v. Lutjens et al
as 2:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Vincent Joe Carter #177803
Defendant:
Christopher Lutjens, J. Feliciano, Kelly Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabi v. Carter-Jones Companies, Inc., d/b/a Carter Lumber
as 4:2021cv11727
Plaintiff:
Sandra Fabi
Defendant:
Carter-Jones Companies, Inc., d/b/a Carter Lumber
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
