Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Jones v. Unknown 6/5/2012 Memo Transmitter et al
as 3:2013cv00982
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Juan Jones
Defendant:
E. L. Sparkman , Unknown EMCF Discliplinary Records Custodian, Unknown EMCF ERS Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Charles Ray Crawford
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, E. L. Sparkman, Earnest Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howard v. Dixon et al
as 4:2012cv00018
Plaintiff:
Julius M. Howard
Defendant:
Lynn Dixon, Mildred Rome, Eddie Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Anderson et al
as 4:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Earless Anderson, Allen Silk, Jesse McCray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stern v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00319
Plaintiff:
James H. Stern
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Margaret Bingham, Eddie Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Epps et al
as 3:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Vincent Tito Bailey
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Bertha Spivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hays v. Leflore County, et al
as 4:2010cv00166
Plaintiff:
Howard Hays
Defendant:
Leflore County, , Richard Chip Roberts , Len Wooden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Epps et al
as 3:2010cv00518
Plaintiff:
Darnell Wilson
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, James Holman, Margarett Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trinh et al v. Giles Family Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00576
Plaintiff:
Lanh Trinh, All Plaintiffs, Thuc Hoang and others
Defendant:
Giles Family Holdings, Inc., Shaw Environmental, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hunter v. Nelson et al
as 4:2007cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tommy Hunter
Defendant:
Lola Nelson, Eddie Cates, Natasha Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
