Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Morse v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Cathy Morse
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Matthews et al v. Guest Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert Matthews, Lawrence Jackson, Jeffrey Johnson and others
Defendant:
Guest Services, Inc., Guest Services, Inc. Termination Pay Plan, Gerard Gabrys and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Erwin v. Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 3:2023cv00762
Plaintiff:
Kanisha Monique Latrice Erwin
Defendant:
Gaston County Department of Health & Human Services, Angela C. Karchmer, Tereasa L. Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whatley v. Judge et al
as 5:2023ct03277
Plaintiff:
Quanterious Hommie Whatley
Defendant:
Cathy Judge and Jimmy Dorman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whatley v. Judge et al
as 3:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Quanterious Hommie Whatley
Defendant:
Cathy Judge and Jimmy Dorman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01208
Plaintiff:
Cathy M. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
