Cases 1 - 10 of 13
CAMMELOT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2021cv02997
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S CAMMELOT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DENNIS MCDONOUGH, RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH V.A. MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CAMMELOT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS et al
as 1:2021cv02823
Plaintiff:
CRAIG S CAMMELOT and CRAIG S. CAMMELOT
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, DENNIS MCDONOUGH, RICHARD L. ROUDEBUSH V.A. MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jackson v. Himelick et al
as 1:2014cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Jackson, Sr
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, Cathy Lee and Randy Albertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgher v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv00266
Plaintiff:
Dennis Corey Burgher
Defendant:
John Doe, Darrell Himelick, D Michael Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greer v. Himelick et al
as 1:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jack M Greer
Defendant:
Darrell Himelick, Randy Albertson, Cathy Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gorczyca v. Lee
as 1:2012cv00125
Plaintiff:
John G Gorczyca
Defendant:
Cathy Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tasby v. Heimlick et al
as 1:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Cartier D Tasby
Defendant:
Darryl Heimlick, Randy Albertson, Cathy Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winters v. Himelick et al
as 1:2009cv00210
Plaintiff:
Fred Winters, Jr
Defendant:
Darryl Himelick and Cathy Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nealis v. Grant County et al
as 1:2008cv00236
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Nealis
Defendant:
Grant County, Oatess Archey, Cathy Lee and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pettiford v. Himelick et al
as 1:2007cv00157
Plaintiff:
Rudell Pettiford
Defendant:
Darryl Himelick, Kevin Pauly, Cathy Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
