Cases 1 - 10 of 624
Incorrectly Filed
as 7:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Eloy Cavazos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Cavazos v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. LB2176690141
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Eloy Cavazos
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. LB2176690141
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
(PC) Cavazos v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavazos
Defendant:
Corcoran State Prison and High Desert State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavazos v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
Roy G Cavazos
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cavazos v. Garsilaso, et al.
as 24-1868
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CAVAZOS
Defendant:
N. GARSILASO, J. TREJO, G. GONZALES and others
Williams II v. Cavazos et al
as 3:2024cv50128
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Williams II
Defendant:
Kimberly Cavazos, Dana L. McCormick, Sue R. Costello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Samaniego et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Alex Bernard Johnson
Defendant:
Placido Samaniego, Jr., James Tanner, George W. McGlothlin, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavazos v. Mira Bahia Corpus Christi LP, et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cavazos
Defendant:
MIRA BAHIA CORPUS CHRISTI LP, PROPORTIONAL PROSPERITY, L.L.C., Marco Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cavazos-De Fuente v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Ulises Cavazos-De Fuente and Ulises Cavazos-De La Fuente
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cavazos v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Eloy Cavazos
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
