Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cavazos v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv01255
Plaintiff: Adam Pete Cavazos
Defendant: Ryan Thornell, Unknown Villa, Unknown Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cavazos #105393 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02051
Defendant: Unknown Nunez, Unknown Sinz, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff: Adam P Cavazos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cavazos v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01635
Plaintiff: Sheryl D Cavazos
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00052
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jamali v. Low et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01054
Plaintiff: Imran Ahmad Jamali
Defendant: Stephanie Danica Low, William Moore, Michael W Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00484
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rhodes v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2011cv01032
Plaintiff: David E Rhodes
Defendant: Phoenix, City of, Jack Harris, Joe Yahner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00775
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181
Cavazos v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv02010
Plaintiff: Sylvia Cavazos
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cavazos v. Schriro et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv00246
Petitioner: Adam Pete Cavazos
Respondent: Dora Schriro, Arizona Attorney General, State of and Terry Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?