Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Stawicki v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv03189
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stawicki and IGGY
Defendant:
Ken Wade, Tim Weed, Trever Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cedeno v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2017cv00057
Petitioner:
Roberto Cedeno
Respondent:
State of Montana, B.O.P.P. and Dan O'Fallon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Boyd v. Harvey et al
as 2:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
James Edward Boyd
Defendant:
Dale Harvey, Julian Cedeno, Alexis Kester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cedeno v. Filson et al
as 3:2017cv00036
Petitioner:
Devin Cedeno
Respondent:
Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Cedeno Donastorg v. Riverside County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2012cv01654
Defendant:
Don Atkinson, Raul Lopez, Riverside County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Cedeno Donastorg
Cardenas v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2011cv05117
Plaintiff:
Leopold Cardenas
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Harold Clarke, Duenich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Linderman v. Cedeno et al
as 3:2010cv05897
Plaintiff:
Garrett Linderman
Defendant:
Ruben Cedeno, Devon Schrum, Karen Brunson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duarte v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tereso Zepeda Duarte
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington Department of Corrections, Airway Heights Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sarah Babcock v. Harold Clarke, et al
as 09-35445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH BABCOCK, AKA John Babcock
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, RUBEN CEDENO, JEFFREY A. UTTECHT and others
Smith v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2009cv05228
Plaintiff:
Scott C Smith
Defendant:
Sullivan, Jones, Caroline Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
