Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv00538
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Stackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv01639
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Criminal Investigative Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Antoine Ray v. Bragg, et al
as 12-5880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE MARQUIS RAY
Defendant - Appellee:
TERRANCE BRAGG, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION and others
Antoine Ray v. Ron Simmons, et al
as 12-5861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOINE MARQUIS RAY
Defendant - Appellee:
RON SIMMONS, N.A.A.C.P., CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Ray v. Bragg
as 1:2012cv00217
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Terrance Bragg, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Communications Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ray v. Simmons et al
as 1:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Antoine Marquis Ray
Defendant:
Ron Joseph Simmons, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Federal Communications Commission
as 1:2011cv00354
Plaintiff:
Antoine Ray
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commission, 2002 Congress, Senate & House of Representative and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chishti v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2011cv12915
Plaintiff:
Muhammad S Chishti
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Lynch v. Miller et al
as 3:2010cv00848
Plaintiff:
Dale J. Lynch
Defendant:
Pete Miller, Kimberley Miller, Kim Spilker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
