Cases 101 - 110 of 142
CHEATOM v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 2:2014cv04993
Plaintiff:
ANDRE CHEATOM
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DARPA, F.B.I. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frederick Banks v. Dictorate, et al
as 14-3474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DICTORATE, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER (CIA), BEHAVIORAL PSYCHOTHERAPY CENTER and others
BANKS v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2014cv04569
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY , US COURT OF APPEALS 3RD CIRCUIT , JIM BRENNAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-2781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Banks v. Cessar et al
as 1:2014cv00636
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Robert Cessar, David J. Hicton, S.A. Longford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. CIA
as 14-1209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Frederick Banks v. S. O.
as 14-1218
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. O., M. O., DIRECTOR CIA and others
Debtor - Appellee:
M. O.
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 14-1219
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, DIRECTOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED NATIONS, EUROPEAN UNION and MEXICO EMBASSY
Frederick Banks v. Director, CIA, et al
as 14-1220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant:
DIRECTOR CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, KELLY, Magistrate Judge, DIRECTOR NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
