Cases 41 - 50 of 142
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CATERBONE v. LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 5:2018cv02710
Defendant:
MIKE GEESEY, ABIGAL PFLUMM, ASHLEY BLAKE and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLATT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 5:2018cv01260
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDREW BLATT
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE CIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Stanley Caterbone, et al v. President United States of Ame, et al
as 17-3400
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, NSA, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECTS AGENCY, DARPA and others
CATERBONE v. TRUMP et al
as 5:2017cv04000
Petitioner:
STANLEY J. CATERBONE and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Respondent:
DONALD TRUMP, NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, DEFENSE ADVANCED RESEARCH PROJECT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOO C. SONG, J. ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT S. CESSAR and others
Frederick Banks v. Adrian Roe, et al
as 17-2787
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
ADRIAN N. ROE, Esq., MARK R. HORNAK, J. ROBERT CESSAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
