Cases 41 - 50 of 123
Arnold v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv04223
Plaintiff:
Marie Arnold
Defendant:
United States of America and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
McIntosh-Jennings v. Graham
as 4:2019cv04313
Plaintiff:
Kaleb McIntosh-Jennings
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington State Fusion Center, Aubry Drake Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Frederick Banks v. Tre Arc Games et al
as 2:2019cv06748
Defendant:
Kyoto Japan Arson Fire, Central Intelligence Agency, The Dry Eye Zone and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Frederick Banks v. Los Angeles Police Department et al
as 5:2019cv00780
Respondent:
Los Angeles Police Department, Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Border Patrol Immigration Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kohler v. Glickman et al
as 3:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Department of Defense, Central Intelligence Agency, Rubin Glickman and others
Plaintiff:
Andreas Kohler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Dearwester v. United States et al
as 2:2019cv00124
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Michael S. Rogers, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Lee Dearwester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2018cv01655
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, U.S. Senate, U.S. House of Representatives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PS) Durlin v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2018cv02709
Plaintiff:
Cody J. Durlin
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dennis Petillo Jr. v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2018cv06837
Plaintiff:
Dennis Petillo, Jr
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ava Gordon v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 2:2018cv03110
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff:
Ava Gordon
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
