Cases 51 - 60 of 93
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv01265
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Roe et al
as 4:2017cv01258
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Banks v. Twenty to Forty unknown named agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Pittsburgh Field Office et al
as 2:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Twenty to Forty unknown named agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Pittsburgh Field Office, Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beard v. United States et al
as 2:2017cv10851
Petitioner:
Warren K. Beard
Respondent:
United States, Donald Trump, Office of the President and others
Frederick Banks v. CIA, et al
as 17-3225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, MARK HORNAK, Judge, ROBERT CESSAR, AUSA and others
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 4:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Mark Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Bordages, Jr. v. DOJ, et al
as 15-6349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES HARRY HEBERT BORDAGES, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES MARSHALS' OFFICE and others
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 5:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Jesse Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, Navy Acting Secretary Stackley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Reid v. Mabus et al
as 1:2015cv02054
Plaintiff:
Jesse Wayne Reid, Jr.
Defendant:
Ray Mabus, Sam Erhart, NCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
