Cases 1 - 10 of 20
FLOYD et al v. PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE et al
as 2:2020cv00931
Respondent:
TOM WOLF, ORLANDO HARPER, PITTSBURGH BUREAU OF POLICE and others
Petitioner:
River Silverelk, Laura Michelle Schlemmer, FREDERICK BANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS V TURKEY ET AL
as 2:2020cv00453
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, SYRIA, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. NPR NEWS MORNING EDITION et al
as 2:2019cv01168
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, GINA HOSPEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
BANKS v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2019cv01009
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Administrative Office for U.S. Courts and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2019cv00509
Respondent:
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH, SCOTT BRADY, AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. ROE, etal
as 2:2017mc00668
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 2:2017mc00671
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. SONG, et al
as 2:2017mc00670
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
