Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 1:2023cv00288
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Johnson
Respondent:
Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Johnson
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Knox v. Soignet et al
as 2:2021cv00390
Defendant:
Stephen Bergeron, Tim Soignet and Rhonda Ledet
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Larpenter et al
as 2:2020cv01737
Defendant:
Jerry Larpenter, Tim Soignet and Jason Pelligrin
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spiers v. Perry et al
as 1:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Spiers
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, Ron Woodall, Mike Hatten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hultquist v. US Department of Homeland Security
as 4:2009cv01992
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Hultquist
Respondent:
US Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hultquist v. Leedy et al
as 4:2009cv01335
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Hultquist
Defendant:
Daniel W. Leedy, Travis J. Koehn and Dewayne Burger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hultquist v. Burger et al
as 4:2009cv01336
Plaintiff:
Chad Edward Hultquist
Defendant:
Dewayne Burger, Phil Baker, Dana Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hultquist v. US Department of Homeland Security
as 4:2009cv01255
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Hultquist
Respondent:
US Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hultquist v. Leedy
as 4:2009cv01256
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Hultquist
Respondent:
Daniel W Leedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
