Cases 11 - 20 of 100
McKinney v. Brandon et al
as 5:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Leavert Kendrell McKinney
Defendant:
Jordan D Brandon, John R Chandler and Stephen Langford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mays v. Johnson et al
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Johnson, Moreno, Heckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buehler et al v. Farrell et al
as 3:2022cv00586
Plaintiff:
Chandler Buehler, Kate Buehler and Robert Buehler
Defendant:
Anna Rose Farrell and J. Kirby Farrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Kincaid et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2022cv00409
Plaintiff:
Caywon Kincaid, Darryl Montgomery, Rubyn Murray and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury and Janet Yellen
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Clervrain et al v. Marshall et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00188
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Jean Ronado
Defendant:
Steven Troy Marshall, Christopher John England, Patricia Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas et al v. Merrill et al
as 2:2021cv01531
Plaintiff:
James Thomas, Laquisha Chandler, Khadidah Stone and others
Defendant:
John H. Merrill, Jim McClendon and Chris Pringle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kayda et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01233
Plaintiff:
Becky Kayda, Arlene Donald, Judith Stockwell and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Kayda et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00317
Plaintiff:
Becky Kayda, Arlene Donald, Judith Stockwell and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
