Cases 11 - 20 of 22
CHANDLER v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 4:2018cv00183
Defendant:
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MARCUS CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
MCLEOD v. DUKES et al
as 7:2018cv00066
Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
JERRI DUKES, BECKY ROTHROCK, HOWELL L WATKINS II REALTY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. TAYLOR
as 5:2017cv00210
Petitioner:
JAMES CHANDLER
Respondent:
CEDRIC TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MCLEOD v. INGRAM et al
as 7:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BILLY INGRAM , BROOKS COUNTY GEORGIA , MYRA EXAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAXTON v. GOTTFRIED et al
as 4:2016cv00320
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER SAXTON
Defendant:
MAUREEN GOTTFRIED, ROBIN KING, RACHELLE HUNTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAXTON v. COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2016cv00082
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER SAXTON
Defendant:
COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and MURRAY GUNDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAHONE v. MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 4:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAMES MAHONE
Defendant:
MIDTOWN MEDICAL CENTER, RYAN CHANDLER, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARDIE v. CHANDLER TELECOM LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00274
Plaintiff:
KEVIN HARDIE
Defendant:
CHANDLER TELECOM LLC, JCB DEVELOPMENT LLC, BOBBIE LEE CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
CHANDLER v. PRINE
as 7:2015cv00128
Petitioner:
CAMERON CHANDLER
Respondent:
CHRIS PRINE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY v. MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS LLC et al
as 5:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CONCEPTS LLC, GREYSTOKE HEALTH SYSTEMS LIMITED, CHANDLER HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
