Cases 1 - 10 of 67
McCLAIN v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
MARTINA WHITE, RALPH MCCLAIN, SHAWN WHITE and others
Defendant:
BLANCHE CARNEY, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ANGELUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLOSKEY v. AMMERMAN et al
as 3:2021cv00164
Petitioner:
CHANDLER DALE MCCLOSKEY
Respondent:
FREDRIC J. AMMERMAN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CLEARFIELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CHANDLER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. ET AL
as 5:2019cv06176
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. ET AL
Plaintiff:
NADIR NAIM CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Brittain et al
as 1:2019cv00059
Defendant:
C.O. Chandler, Major Wynder, -, Unit Manager Dowd and others
Plaintiff:
Haddrick Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURPHY et al v. ALGARIN et al
as 2:2018cv04207
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MAXWELL CHILCOTE, ADAM LOGAL, SHAMARR CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOES, WARDEN ALGARIN, DEPUTY WARDEN MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC et al
as 5:2018cv00495
Plaintiff:
NADIR NAIM CHANDLER
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL INC and NORTHAMPTON COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHANDLER v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2017cv05503
Petitioner:
NATHAN CHANDLER
Respondent:
JAMEY LUTHER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA CITY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Velazquez v. Chandler
as 3:2015cv02023
Petitioner:
Withberto Velazquez
Respondent:
Rodney W Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chandler v. Fasciano
as 1:2014cv02356
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
Francis Fasciano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chandler v. Norwood et al
as 1:2014cv01921
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Chandler, Sr.
Defendant:
J. L. Norwood, Ebbert, Susann Stover and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
