Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Newsome v. Terhune
as 4:2018cv00268
Plaintiff:
Chanel Newsome
Defendant:
Aaron Terhune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hinton et al v. Johnson & Johnson,Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01934
Plaintiff:
Barbara Hinton , Allen Abernethy , Billie Albers and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Flowers et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2016cv03998
Plaintiff:
Chanelle Flowers and Ricky Hardison
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. $4,093.23 In United States Currency From Landmark Bank Account Number 2114008234, et al
as 2:2016cv04012
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$4,093.23 In United States Currency Seized From Landmark Bank Account Number 2114008234, $3,603.27 In United States Currency Seized From Landmark Bank Account Number 2114008259, $9,360.00 In United States Currency Seized From the Rodgers Residence and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Bullock et al v. Alfa Vision Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Chanel Bullock , Ernest Bullock and Tito Chitanda
Defendant:
Alfa Vision Insurance Corporation and Jonathan Mbaya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roberts et al v. SSM Health Care St. Louis
as 4:2013cv01849
Plaintiff:
Maureen Roberts and Chanel Jones
Defendant:
SSM Health Care St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Hughes v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 4:2013cv00256
Plaintiff:
Donald F Hughes
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America , Linda Butkovich and Chanelle Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Chanel, Inc. et al v. Delmar Wholesale Plus, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01798
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc. and Gucci America, Inc.
Defendant:
Delmar Wholesale Plus, Inc. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
