Cases
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Chamber of Commerce of USA, et al v. Edmondson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-6127
Plaintiff - Appellee: METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC., GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, OKLAHOMA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellant: MARK ASHTON, ANN CONG-TANG, DREW EDMONDSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the state of Oklahoma and others
Defendant: BRAD HENRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of Oklahoma, THOMAS E. KEMP, JR., JERRY JOHNSON and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, CHANGE TO WIN, ARIZONA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY and others
State of California v. Safeway, Inc., et al
as 08-55708
Plaintiff - Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant: SAFEWAY, INC., a Safeway Company doing business as Vons, ALBERTSONS, INC., RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, a division of the Kroger Company and others
Amicus Curiae: THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHIMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE USA and others
State of California v. Safeway, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-55671
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee: SAFEWAY, INC., a Safeway Company doing business as Vons, ALBERTSONS, INC., RALPHS GROCERY COMPANY, a division of the Kroger Company and others
Amicus Curiae: THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, THE STATES- THE ATTORNEYS GENERAL OF ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, MISSOURI, MONTANA, NEVADA, OHIO, OKLAHIMA, OREGON, TENNESSEE, WASHINGTON AND WEST VIRGINIA, CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE USA and others
Cintas Corporation et al v. Unite Here et al
as 1:2008cv02185
Plaintiff: Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation and others
Defendant: Unite Here, Change to Win, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smithfield Food, Inc. et al v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union et al
as 3:2007cv00641
Plaintiff: Smithfield Food, Inc., Smithfield Food, Inc., Smithfield Food, Inc. and others
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, United Food and Commercial Workers Local No. 400, Change To Win and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pedro Lozano v. City of Hazleton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3531
Plaintiff - Appellee: PEDRO LOZANO, HUMBERTO HERNANDEZ, ROSA LECHUGA and others
Defendant - Appellant: CITY OF HAZLETON
Not Party - Amicus Appellant: DAMON SCOTT, JUDICIAL WATCH INC, WASHINGTON LEGAL and others
Not Party - Amicus Appellee: CHAMBER COMMERCE US, AZ CHAMBER COMMERCE IND, CO ASSN COMMERCE IND and others
Granite Rock Company, et al v. Local 287, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-16142
Plaintiff - Appellee: GRANITE ROCK COMPANY
Intervenor - Pending: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Defendant - Appellant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, FREIGHT, CONSTRUCTION, GENERAL DRIVERS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS, LOCAL 287 (AFL-CIO)
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Amicus Curiae: CHANGE TO WIN and CHANGE TO WIN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?