Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Bell v. Leavenworth Penitentiary et al
as 3:2024cv50200
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bell
Defendant:
Leavenworh Penitentiary, Warden D. Hudson, McMillen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunford v. Leon et al
as 1:2024cv04166
Plaintiff:
Darren A Lunford
Defendant:
Pedro Leon, S. Miller, T. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Dollar General et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Plaintiff:
Celeste J Curry
Defendant:
Dollar General, Alexis Chaplain, Laura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv02718
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Mitchell
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Rob Jeffreys, Dianna Brookhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2023cv02856
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jackson
Defendant:
David Mitchell, Chaplain Arnold, C. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aigbekaen v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
USA, Merrick Garland, BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Clark v. Dave et al
as 3:2023cv50024
Plaintiff:
Wasim Lamont Clark
Defendant:
Chaplain Dave and Chaplain Laura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
Deon Hampton
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys, Camile Lyndsay, Logan Correctional Center Mental Health Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abuharba v Claycomb et al
as 3:2021cv01077
Plaintiff:
Monammed Abuharba
Defendant:
Chaplain Claycomb, Chief Keim, Lance Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winfrey-Bey v. Burle et al
as 3:2021cv00889
Plaintiff:
Albert Winfrey-Bey
Defendant:
Amy Burle, Jon Fatheree, David Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
