Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Chapman v. USA
as 5:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Michael Jarrell Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chapman v. USA
as 3:2024cv00376
Petitioner:
Ishmeel Qyshawn Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CHAPMAN v. TRAVEL RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
TRAVEL RESORTS OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Meyers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Peter Buchholtz, Brandeshawn Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Honeycutt et al
as 5:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
R. Honeycutt, Amy Jenkins, Daniel Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
ABARA JOHNSON, ANN HAYES, ANNIE SCOTT and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TMX FINANCE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McCulley v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Christina Chapman McCulley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chapman v. Angel
as 3:2023cv00497
Plaintiff:
Tonya T Chapman
Defendant:
Kirk J Angel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Chapman v. USA
as 3:2023cv00225
Petitioner:
Ishmeel Qyshawn Chapman
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
