Cases 1 - 10 of 151
Charles v. Chapman
as 1:2024cv00493
Petitioner:
Lawrence Charles
Respondent:
Michael Chapman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cunningham v. Loudoun County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Colette Cunningham
Defendant:
Loudoun County Sheriff's Office and Michael L. Chapman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Chapman v. O'Malley
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Chapman
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2023cv01211
Plaintiff:
Roy Mandell Smith
Defendant:
Chesterfield VA Sheriff Department, Kevin Connolly, Aaron Kirk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biro v. Flynn et al
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
Riley Dyson Biro
Defendant:
Timothy Flynn, Tavis Henry, Mike Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. Loudoun County Sheriff Office et al
as 2:2023cv00154
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nathaniel Davis and Darren Nathaniel Davis
Defendant:
Loudoun County Sheriff Office, Kim Holway, David Wozniak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
