Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Chappell v. Texas Steakhouse of Alabama, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00140
Plaintiff:
Kerry Chappell
Defendant:
Texas Steakhouse of Alabama, Inc. and B.A.T.S. Security
Movant:
Colony Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chappell v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chappell
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels, Luther Strange and Robert J. Bentley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chappell v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00907
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chappell
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adley-White et al v. United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02055
Plaintiff:
Veronica Adley-White , Cletus Agomuo , Ronald Averhart and others
Defendant:
United States Pipe and Foundry Company LLC , Mueller Water Products Inc and USP Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Gams et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00705
Plaintiff:
Wendy Williams
Defendant:
David Gams, Nurse Chappel, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00369
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 1:2015cv00281
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Pivnichny et al
as 2:2015cv00864
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chappell v. Daniels et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2015cv00303
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chappell
Defendant:
Leeposey Daniels and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chappell v. McCooey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2015cv00293
Plaintiff:
Leon Chappell
Defendant:
Tracy S. McCooey, Blair Benson, Paul Esco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
