Cases 1 - 10 of 461
Britt v. Moulette et al
as 3:2024cv00980
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Britt
Defendant:
Miguel Moulette, Megan O'Shea and Commissioner of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Marc T. Treadwell, Charles H. Weigle, Sonja Profit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hines et al v. Sirchrsy Systems et al
as 3:2024cv00969
Plaintiff:
Telly Hines and Marquese Hines
Defendant:
Sirchrsy Systems, Charles Town Acts, Katrina Camera and others
Pascale et al v. Scheier
as 3:2024cv00859
Plaintiff:
Charles Pascale and Jessica Pascale
Defendant:
Donald Scheier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Asfazadour v. Chuck's Trucks, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
Paul Asfazadour
Defendant:
Chuck's Trucks, LLC and Charles J. Mantiglia, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wilson v. D.O.C.
as 3:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Charles Wilson
Defendant:
D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Osborn CI
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Smith, Jr. II and Charles D. Smith, Jr II
Defendant:
Osborn CI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
Wojcik v. Saas et al
as 3:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joesph Wojcik
Defendant:
Robert Saas, Adam Leonetti, Israel Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman et al v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff:
Hanif Aminuddin, Dhati Coleman, Andre Reed and others
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
