Cases 1 - 10 of 21
DAVIS v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2017cv00467
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, JANE/JOHN DOES, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
LEN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PARKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID ROYER
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
HSA:
A. RUPSKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, CAPTAIN, JOHN CARAWAY and others
Recruited Counsel:
ONI N. HARTON, JOHN MALEY and LADENE MENDOZA
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BADLEY v. GRANGER et al
as 2:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
ANDRE BADLEY
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Mr. F. GRANGER, L. LARIVA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
FOSTER v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00474
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Petitioner:
ROBERT FOSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WOODWARD v. DANIELS et al
as 2:2016cv00304
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, S. JULIAN and WARDEN
Petitioner:
ELLO MITCHELL WOODWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BLACKWELL v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00241
Petitioner:
KEITH L. BLACKWELL
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCGHEE v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00156
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Petitioner:
MITCHELL C. MCGHEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TAYLOR v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00079
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Petitioner:
ROBERT TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GREATHOUSE v. DANIELS
as 2:2016cv00072
Respondent:
CHARLES A. DANIELS
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY GREATHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
