Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Baldwin et al v. FedNat Insurance Co
as 2:2022cv01178
Plaintiff:
Charles Baldwin and Karen Baldwin
Defendant:
FedNat Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Baldwin et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05411
Plaintiff:
Charles Baldwin and Diane Baldwin
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Akins, et al v. Worley Catastrophe Response, et al
as 13-30282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN AKINS, Individually and, on behalf of all others similarly situated and identified below, TIM ALLEN, EMORY ARCHER and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SULLIVAN, CHARLES BALDWIN, JOHNNY KNIGHTEN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLEY CATASTROPHE RESPONSE, L.L.C., WORLEY CATASTROPHE SERVICES, L.L.C. and MICHAEL WORLEY
Baldwin et al v. New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company et al
as 2:2008cv01274
Plaintiff:
Christopher Charles Baldwin and Charles Albert Baldwin, III
Defendant:
New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company, New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Company, Tracy Ulm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
West, et al v. Nalco Chemical Co, et al
as 1:2000cv00626
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, dba, Illinois Central Railroad Company incorrectly referred to as Canadian National Railway Company formerly known as Illinois Central Industries Inc doing business as Illinois Central Railway, Nalco Chemical Company and others
Plaintiff:
All Plaintiffs, Erica Aaron, MacArthur Abbs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
