Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Frank Nali v. Jodi Angelo, et al
as 11-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK NALI
Defendant - Appellee:
JODI ANGELO, LAURIN THOMAS, JAMES ATTERBERRY and others
Beauchamp v. Rubitschun et al
as 2:2010cv12901
Plaintiff:
Mark Beauchamp
Defendant:
John S Rubitschun, James Atterberry, Miguel Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Nali v. Angelo et al
as 2:2010cv11363
Plaintiff:
Frank Nali
Defendant:
Jodi Angelo, Laurin Thomas, James Atterberry and others
Lavere Lee-Bryant v. Unknown Sindles, et al
as 09-1429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAVERE LEE-BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN SINDLES, UNKNOWN JENKINS, Resident Unit Officer, in their individual capacity, UNKNOWN TESSERMAN, Sergeant, in their individual capacity and others
Sipes #271473 et al v. Sampson et al
as 2:2008cv00213
Plaintiff:
Bennett Wayne Sipes #271473, Ronald George Grandchamp #496925, Dale Douglas Denton #322917 and others
Defendant:
Barbara S. Sampson, Laurin Thomas, James Quinlan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee-Bryant #337291 v. Beseau et al
as 2:2008cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lavere Lee-Bryant #337291
Defendant:
James Beseau, Michael Robinson, Dan Durant and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lee-Bryant #337291 v. Sindles et al
as 2:2008cv00121
Plaintiff:
Lavere Lee-Bryant #337291
Defendant:
Unknown Sindles, Unknown Jenkins, Unknown Tesserman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gerry Vaught v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 08-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GERRY VAUGHT
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, JOHN SCHLINKER, MIGUEL BERRIOS and others
Vaught v. Sampson et al
as 2:2008cv11040
Plaintiff:
Gerry Vaught
Defendant:
Barbara Sampson, John Schlinker, Miguel Berrios and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wicks v. Rubitschin et al
as 4:2008cv10976
Plaintiff:
Jerald Wicks
Defendant:
John Rubitschin, James Quinlan, Charles Braddock and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
