Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Kelly et al
as 3:2015cv01195
Plaintiff:
Armoni Masud Johnson
Defendant:
Matthew Kelly, Charles Ross, Charles Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Dequillarae Zellou
as 15-2373
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEQUILLARAE ZELLOUS, a/k/a Rae Zellous, a/k/a Strong, a/k/a Charles Brown, a/k/a Daryl Lewis, a/k/a Dequillarae Zellows, a/k/a Charles Warren
BROWN v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2013cv07682
Petitioner:
CHARLES BROWN
Respondent:
JOHN C. THOMAS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Brown v. Superintendent Fayette SCI
as 13-4262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
USA v. Dequillarae Zellou
as 13-4232
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DEQUILLARAE ZELLOUS, aka Rae Zellous, aka Strong, aka Charles Brown, aka Daryl Lewis, aka Dequillarae Zellows, aka Charles Warren
PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE COMPANY v. FINNELL et al
as 2:2013cv02902
Plaintiff:
PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
NACOMO FINNELL, CHARLES BROWN, ERNEST MARSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BROWNING v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01367
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BROWNING
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA RETRIEVAL SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
