Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Campbell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 6:2024cv01010
Plaintiff:
Nathan Charles Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Campbell v. Bolingbrook Police Department
as 1:2017cv02402
Plaintiff:
Rodney Charles Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Bolingbrook Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Bolingbrook Police Department
as 3:2017cv03085
Plaintiff:
Rodney Charles Campbell, Jr
Defendant:
Bolingbrook Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Geisendaffer et al
as 1:2010cv02974
Plaintiff:
Charles Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Steven Geisendaffer and Robbin Grelecki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv11774
Plaintiff:
Regina Campbell and Charles Campbell, Jr.
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv20173
Plaintiff:
Amy Campbell and Charles Campbell , Jr.
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
Amy Campbell, Amy Campbell, Amy Campbell and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
House of God Which is the Chur v. Bishop Charles Campbell, et al
as 08-5391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOUSE OF GOD WHICH IS THE CHURCH OF THE LIVING GOD THE PILLAR AND GROUND OF THE TRUTH WITHOUT CONTROVERSY, INC. (KEITH DOMINION)
Defendant - Appellee:
BISHOP CHARLES CAMPBELL, CHARLES CAMPBELL, JR. and PHILLIP CAMPBELL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
