Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lorendzo Holte v. Attorney General, State of Florida, et al
as 23-10091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENDZO DAVID HOLTE
Defendant / Appellee:
ASHLEY MOODY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, ED BROSKY and others
Lorendzo Holte v. Department of Revenue, et al
as 22-11851
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LORENDZO DAVID HOLTE
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHARLES DENTON, STEPHEN MATHEW WHYTE and others
Holte v. Moody et al
as 8:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Lorendzo David Holte
Defendant:
Ashley Moody, Ed Brosky, Wendy Makholm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holte v. Department of Revenue et al
as 8:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Lorendzo David Holte
Defendant:
Department of Revenue, Charles Denton, Stephen Mathew Whyte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Denton v. NewRez LLC
as 3:2021cv00743
Defendant:
NewRez LLC doing business as PHH Mortgage Services
Plaintiff:
Charles Denton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DENTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv36949
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DENTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv01328
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DENTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Favors v. Manatee County et al
as 8:2018cv02629
Defendant:
Diana Moreland, Lela Idella Behn, Manatee County and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Glenn Favors, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Denton v. Morongo Gaming Association et al
as 5:2017cv01120
Plaintiff:
Charles Denton
Defendant:
Does, Morongo Casino Resort and Spa, Morongo Gaming Association and others
Sheridan v. Building Materials Corporation of America
as 2:2015cv00122
Plaintiff:
Chad Sheridan and Charles Denton
Defendant:
BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
