Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Valenzuela v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00110
Plaintiff:
Roberto Guerrero-Valenzuela
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Baltazar v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Javier Jesus Medina Baltazar
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
De Los Santos v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Roberto Carlos De Los Santos
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mata v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00096
Plaintiff:
Adan Guerra Mata
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Terrazas v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Manuel Efren Terrazas
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Murray v. Samuels et al
as 1:2016cv00197
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Murray
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, John A Keller, Frank Lara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bezeredi v. Lynch et al
as 5:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
John Bezeredi
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and Dave Brekebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GORDON v. SAMUELS
as 4:2016cv00019
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LEE GORDON
Respondent:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2015cv02622
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Jones
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and Charles E Samuels, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jerry Dedrick v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-10968
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY LEWIS DEDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
LORETTA LYNCH, Unites States Attorney General, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of Bureau of Prisons and BARACK OBAMA, United States President and the Commander in Chief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
