Cases 1 - 10 of 32
SMITH
as 2:2021cv05001
In Re:
CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
Dauphin County Domestics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant:
DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CARLOS SAUL, MIKE GREENBURG, ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Smith, Jr. v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 20-1621
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv16803
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv01241
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Smith
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Swatara Township Police Department and Dauphin County Booking Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 1:2018cv00838
Petitioner:
Charles E. Smith
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Clark and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Charles Smith
as 18-1236
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAUPHIN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Charles Smith v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 18-1003
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, HARRISBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, DENNIS SIMMONS and others
Nominal Respondent:
YVETTE KANE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
