Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Anderson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00795
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD ANDERSON
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
L.A., et. al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv12050
Defendant:
United States of America, W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Charles Edward Rollison, DO and others
Plaintiff:
L. A., Kiersten Reeser and Jeremy Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
A et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv11317
Defendant:
W.A. Foote Memorial Hospital d/b/a HENRY FORD ALLEGIANCE HEALTH, Alma Garlo, MD, Monica Hill, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Armstrong, Kiersten Reeser and L A
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Walker v. Kinney et al
as 3:2017cv00712
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Walker
Defendant:
Dean Kinney and AOK Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2015dp20238
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwards
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gloria Ashby et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Gloria Ashby , Oliver Woods Sr , Edna Adams and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Eli Lilly and Company , aaiPharma Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shulman et al v. Carrigan
as 1:2014cv00317
Plaintiff:
Ari Shulman
Defendant:
Charles Edward Carrigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 1:2011dp22501
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Fisher
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henderson et al v. Shivam, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00072
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Henderson, Charles Edward Henderson, Charles Edward Henderson and others
Defendant:
Shivam, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
