Cases 1 - 10 of 78
Balwin Hills Investors Ltd. v. Charles Finley, Jr.
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Balwin Hills Investors Ltd. and Baldwin Hills Investors, LTD.
Defendant:
Charles Edward Finley, Jr. individually, and doing business as My Mailbox
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Luckett v. People of State of California
as 4:2022cv06634
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Luckett
Respondent:
People of State of California
Defendant:
Landon Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Edward Baines v. Theresa Cisneros
as 2:2022cv05123
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Baines
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Diaz et al
as 3:2021cv01188
Defendant:
Travis, Ralph Diaz, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Allen v. Diaz et al
as 3:2021cv00602
Defendant:
Travis, Ralph Diaz, Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Edwards v. Smith
as 1:2020cv01822
Defendant:
D. Smith
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Cardenas et al
as 3:2020cv00788
Defendant:
M. Carrillo, Ralph M. Diaz, L. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Allen v. Booth et al
as 3:2020cv00685
Defendant:
A. Booth, W.L. Montgomery and Ralph M. Diaz
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Shipman v. Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv02412
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Shipman
Respondent:
Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
