Cases 61 - 70 of 3,646
Ziegenfuss v. Ryan et al
as 2:2020cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Norman Ziegenfuss, Jr. and Ziegenfuss
Defendant:
Unknown Salas, Julia E Erwin, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown #156811 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Diane Meloche, Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of and others
Plaintiff:
Patrice Edmond Brown, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brandon v. Ryan et al
as 2:2020cv00117
Plaintiff:
Deniel Desmond Brandon
Defendant:
Unknown Renault, Unknown Aceves, Unknown Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heffington v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Gerald Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Heffington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morales v. Ryan et al
as 2:2020cv00089
Defendant:
Tara Diaz, Charles L Ryan and Jeff Van Winkle
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Morales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
June #265480 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Unknown Scott, Tara Diaz, Stephen Morris and others
Plaintiff:
Robert K June, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams #190857 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Unknown Comacho, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Bennett Laquan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frost v. Shinn et al
as 4:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
Raymond Ludwig Frost
Defendant:
David Shinn, Terry Adriance, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molina #061492 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2020cv00009
Petitioner:
Juan C Molina
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Valenzuela v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05902
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Catarino Torres Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
