Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Appalseed Productions, Inc. et al v. Medianet Digital, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05922
Plaintiff:
Appalseed Productions, Inc. , Charles Lloyd , Darius Brooks and others
Defendant:
Medianet Digital, Inc., Alan McGlade and Stephen Barraclough
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Appalseed Productions, Inc. et al v. Escape Media Group, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00681
Plaintiff:
Appalseed Productions, Inc. , Charles Lloyd , Darius Brooks and others
Defendant:
Escape Media Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Charles Brown v. Ben Curry
as 10-17103
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES LLOYD BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
BEN CURRY
MCS Music America, Inc. et al v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00597
Plaintiff:
MCS Music America, Inc., Conexion Media Group, PLC, Mark Farner and others
Defendant:
Yahoo!, Inc., RealNetworks, Inc. and Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Brown v. Curry
as 3:2008cv03596
Petitioner:
Charles Lloyd Brown
Respondent:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Charles William
as 08-30241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES LLOYD WILLIAMS
Patterson v. USA
as 1:2008cv01348
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd Patterson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
BENNETT et al v. AQUA-CHEM, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv76828
Plaintiff:
CHARLES LLOYD BENNETT and TWINA M. BENNETT
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM, INC., BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC, INC., CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Charles Lloyd Bennett, et al. v. Aqua-Chem, Inc., et al.
as NCW/1:08-CV-00037
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd Bennett
Bennett et al v. Aqua-Chem, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00037
Plaintiff:
Charles Lloyd Bennett and Twina M. Bennett
Defendant:
Aqua-Chem, Inc., Borg-Warner Morse TEC, Inc., CertainTeed Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
