Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Stokes v. Miss Scarborough et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2020cv01675
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant: Miss Scarborough, Miss Richardson and Mr. Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Michael Stokes v. Bryan P. Stirling et al
as 9:2019cv01992
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant: Sharon Sims, Michael McCall, Wanda Golden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Charles Stoke
as 17-260
Movant: In re: CHARLES MICHAEL STOKES
:
Stokes v. McFadden
as 9:2017cv00407
Petitioner: Charles Michael Stokes
Respondent: Joseph McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stokes v. Stirling et al
as 9:2015cv02956
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant: Bryan P Stirling, Roger Shepard and Larry Reginald Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Hallman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2015cv00129
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant: Ann Hallman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Cartledge et al
as 9:2014cv00667
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant: Larry Cartledge, Daniel Cotter and D Burzinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Harbin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv03146
Plaintiff: Charles Michael Stokes
Defendant: Hunter Chase Harbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Stokes v. Cartledge We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2012cv03007
Petitioner: Charles Michael Stokes
Respondent: Larry Cartledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Stokes v. Andrew Moorman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-7411
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES MICHAEL STOKES
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW MOORMAN, sued in his individual and official capacities

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?