Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kinkaid v. United States
as 3:2019cv05867
Plaintiff:
Charles R Kinkaid, Jr
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Simms v. Charles R Schwab et al
as 3:2019cv05642
Defendant:
John Doe, Schwab Employees, Walter W Bettinger, II and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jerimiah Simms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Sinclair et al
as 2:2018cv00210
Plaintiff:
Charles R Jones
Defendant:
Stephen Sinclair, Kevin Bovenkamp, Louis Sowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stiller v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Mark A Stiller
Defendant:
State of Washington, Charles R Synder, Mac D Setter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockwell et al v. Port of Seattle et al
as 2:2016cv00483
Plaintiff:
Charles R Stockwell, Sr and Lily Stockwell
Defendant:
Port of Seattle , Sean Gillebo , Jane Doe Gillebo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED.
as 2:2014cv01645
Plaintiff:
401(k) Committee for the Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc. Union Hourly 401(k) Plan
Defendant:
Charles R Van Nurden and Patricia James Andersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
401(k) Committee for the Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc. Union Hourly 401(k) Plan v. Van Nurden et al
as 3:2014cv05850
Plaintiff:
401(k) Committee for the Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc. Union Hourly 401(k) Plan
Defendant:
Charles R Van Nurden and Patricia James Andersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wade v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv05596
Plaintiff:
Charles R Wade
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2010cv01283
Defendant:
Amtrak National Railroad Passenger Corp
Plaintiff:
Charles R Allen
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Allen v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2010cv01284
Plaintiff:
Charles R Allen
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
