Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Altus Group US, Inc. v. Matheidas et al
as 4:2023cv01058
Plaintiff:
Altus Group US, Inc.
Defendant:
Brad Matheidas, Beverly Kirkpatrick, Will Beazley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Young v. Rowe et al
as 5:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Kelly Rowe, FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-1 and FNU LNU 5:23-CV-190-H-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Lubbock County Sheriff
as 5:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Charles Young
Respondent:
TDCJ Parole Division, Daniella Martinez, Vicente Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Young v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2018cv03619
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv03742
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Young v. Prator et al
as 5:2015cv02621
Plaintiff:
Charles Young, Jr
Defendant:
Steve Prator and Worden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc.
as 3:2015cv02461
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Young v. CITI Mortgage, et al
as 3:2013cv00836
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Linda Young
Defendant:
CITI Mortgage Inc., Gov. Federal Reserve Bank of N.Y., Board of Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young v. CITI Mortgage, et al
as 5:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
Charles Young and Linda Young
Defendant:
CITI Mortgage Inc., Gov. Federal Reserve Bank of N.Y., Board of Examiners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young v. Ortega Rafael et al
as 3:2013cv02449
Plaintiff:
Charles Young
Defendant:
Ortega Rafael and Juan Carlos Ruvalcaba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
