Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Charlie Hardin v. Tobias Turley
as 24-7021
Defendant:
JAMES E. PIERCE, CASE MANAGER MOORE, CASE MANAGER BAZZLE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Hardin v. Cooper et al
as 5:2024ct03235
Defendant:
Pete Buchholtz, Todd Ishee, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlie Hardin v. Superintendent Roach
as 23-6973
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROACH, SUPERINTENDENT ALBRIGHT, SUPERINTENDENT CROWE and others
Charlie Hardin v. Elizabeth Peake
as 23-6308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, SUPERINTENDENT OF SCOTLAND, OFFICER WILEY and others
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 5:2023ct03070
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
Officer Roach, Superintendent Albright, Superintendent Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Roach et al
as 3:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Charlie L Hardin
Defendant:
FNU Roach, FNU Albright, FNU Crowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlie Hardin v. D. Everett
as 23-6105
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant / Appellee:
D. EVERETT, Superintendent, CAPTAIN TURLEY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MULLEN and others
HARDIN v. PEAKE et al
as 1:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE, KATY POOLE, OFFICER WILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Everett et al
as 5:2022ct03255
Plaintiff:
Charlie L. Hardin
Defendant:
D. Everett, Captain Turley, C/O Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDIN v. PEAKE
as 1:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE L. HARDIN
Defendant:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH JOI PEAKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
