Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Haggins v. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 3:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Mary Haggins
Defendant:
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Charlotte District Office, Charlotte Housing Authority, Mecklenburg County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carol Stein v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital
as 19-2332
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLOTTE HOUSING AUTHORITY, DEXTER MOSELEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAROL ANDREA STEIN
Pless v. Clark et al
as 3:2019cv00326
Defendant:
Charlotte Walker, Kimberly Connor, Elizabeth Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Jamecia Teiony Pless
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Stein v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al
as 3:2018cv00564
Defendant:
Frank Moon, Lila Wigan, Rodney Monroe and others
Plaintiff:
Carol Andrea Stein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cherry Reaves v. USPS
as 14-1076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERRY REAVES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, CHARLOTTE HOUSING AUTHORITY and YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
Reaves v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00632
Plaintiff:
Cherry Reaves
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Charlotte Housing Authority and Youth and Family Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-10793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-13669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
