Cases 1 - 10 of 759
MCCANTS v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2024cv05837
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCCANTS
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO doing business as JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M&T Bank v. Chryssoula Arsenis, et al
as 24-1723
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK, other Hudson City Savings Bank
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
John Morris Anderson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORRIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
MANDAL v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01643
Plaintiff:
SMRITIMAY MANDAL
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jonathan Gould v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, et al
as 24-1704
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN GOULD
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA and JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ANDERSON v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
as 2:2024cv01425
Plaintiff:
JOHN MORRIS ANDERSON
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
M&T BANK v. ARSENIS et al
as 3:2024cv04561
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal- Foreclosure
DILLARD v. WELLS FARGO BANK et al
as 2:2024cv04146
Plaintiff:
DERECK DILLARD
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO BANK and CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Argus Information & Advisory Services Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00348
Defendant:
Argus Information & Advisory Services Inc., Argus Information & Advisory Services LLC, Verisk Analytics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
