Cases 1 - 10 of 76
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv04123
Plaintiff:
Keisha Shavon Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, President Joe Biden, Free Masons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Houston v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 1:2023cv02792
Plaintiff:
Larry Houston
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., Frank Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association v. Washington et al
as 1:2022cv04401
Plaintiff:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Renee A Washington, Chicago Title Land Trust Company, and Unknown Owners And Nonrecord Claimants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harradon v. Chase Bank
as 1:2021cv00415
Plaintiff:
David Harradon
Defendant:
Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Goh Chok Tong, President Barack Obama and others
Bowes-Northern v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 3:2021cv00803
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Bowes-Northern
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, Jamie Dimon and Crystal Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
