Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Vikas WSP, Limited v. Economy Mud Products Company
as 17-20212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIKAS WSP, LIMITED
Defendant - Appellee:
ECONOMY MUD PRODUCTS COMPANY, also known as Economy Polymers & Chemical, Incorporated
Vikas WSP Limited v. Economy Mud Products Company
as 16-20695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VIKAS WSP LIMITED
Defendant - Appellee:
ECONOMY MUD PRODUCTS COMPANY, also known as Economy Polymers & Chemical, Incorporated
Geo Specialty Chemicals, Inc. v. Foley and Lardner, LLP, et al
as 13-7042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Geo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellee:
Foley and Lardner, LLP and Gregory Husisian
GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED v. HUSISIAN et al
as 1:2012cv01819
Plaintiff:
GEO SPECIALTY CHEMICALS, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
GREGORY HUSISIAN and FOLEY AND LARDNER, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Opto Generic Devices, Incorpor v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inco
as 10-769
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Opto Generic Devices, Incorporated
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Air Products & Chemicals, Incorporated
Servicios Quimicos EIRL v. Nova Chemicals, Incorporated
as 2:2009cv12979
Plaintiff:
Servicios Quimicos EIRL and Servicios Quimicos EIRL
Defendant:
Nova Chemicals, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Type:
Contract
Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Incorporated v. Tolan Machinery Company, Incorporated
as 3:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Incorporated
Defendant:
Tolan Machinery Company, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Opto Generic Devices, Inc. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Incorporated
as 6:2008cv00234
Plaintiff:
Opto Generic Devices, Inc. and Opto Generic Devices, Inc.
Defendant:
Air Products & Chemicals, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
