Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Schulmann v. Conrad et al
as 1:2026cv13104
Plaintiff:
Monica Schulmann
Defendant:
Robert J Conrad, Eric Komitee, Margo K Brodie and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Schulmann v. Conrad et al
as 1:2026cv00279
Plaintiff:
Monica Schulmann
Defendant:
Robert J Conrad, Eric Komitee, Margo K Brodie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schulmann v. Conrad et al
as 1:2026cv00312
Plaintiff:
Monica Schulmann
Defendant:
Robert J Conrad, Eric Komitee, Margo K Brodie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 145
Han et al v. Point Ruston LLC et al
as 3:2026cv05697
Plaintiff:
Bingru Han, Bo Liu, Changjun Gu and others
Defendant:
Point Ruston LLC, Point Ruston Phase II LLC, Loren M Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CHEN-GOARDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv00331
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY J CHEN-GOARDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Tang v. Futu Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2026cv05453
Plaintiff:
Yong Hong Tang
Defendant:
Futu Holdings Limited, Leaf Hua Li and Arthur Yu Chen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Chen v. Ong et al
as 1:2026cv05455
Plaintiff:
Frank Chen
Defendant:
Yu Kai James Ong, Amr Thameen, Spellbinder AI, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Chen v. Blanche
as 26-1744
Petitioner:
YU ZHU CHEN
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
