Cases 11 - 20 of 44
In Re: NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS
as 1:2022mc00060
In Re:
NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS
Petitioner:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Respondent:
STEPHEN K. BANNON
NAVARRO v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2022cv01519
Plaintiff:
PETER NAVARRO
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Waldron v. AT&T, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00317
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Waldron
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc., Bennie G Thompson, Elizabeth L Cheney and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Bundren Law Group PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
BUDOWICH et al v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv03366
Plaintiff:
Taylor Budowich and Conservative Strategies, Inc.
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, Bennie Thompson, Elizabeth Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Flynn v. Pelosi et al
as 2:2021cv00946
Plaintiff:
Michael Flynn
Defendant:
Nancy Pelosi, Bennie G. Thompson, Elizabeth L. Cheney and others
Shaw et al v. Oakland County Friend of Court et al
as 5:2020cv12492
Plaintiff:
Donnelle Shaw and Poor People Republic
Defendant:
Tara Perez, Shelly Wine, Jessica Cooper and others
Allco Finance Limited et al v. Roisman et al
as 2:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
Allco Finance Limited, Otter Creek Solar LLC and PLH Vineyard Sky LLC
Defendant:
Anthony Roisman, Sarah Hofmann and Margaret Cheney
Cheney v. CFT Auto Investors, LLC et al
as 7:2018cv00211
Defendant:
CFT Auto Investors, LLC, Hendrick Automotive Group, Hendrick Toyota of Wilmington and others
Plaintiff:
Texas Neil Cheney
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Charles Kinney v. Frances Rothschild, et al
as 17-56356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES G. KINNEY
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANCES ROTHSCHILD, VICTORIA CHENEY, JEFFREY JOHNSON and others
Kinney v. Rothschild et al
as 3:2017cv03493
Plaintiff:
Charles Kinney
Defendant:
Frances Rothschild , Victoria Cheney , Jeffrey Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
